Cannabis and Neural Debiasing

Cannabis has been a taboo for quite a long time now. Whereas it used to be fundamental to civilization as food, fiber, and medicine, some rich people must have figured out it was "too good of a medicine or nutrient". If you look in sacks of bird seed, you will find a large proportion to be the "illegal" hemp seed. But it's illegal, and therefore bad. How do we know it's bad? There are many "important" people who say that. We don't decide for ourselves. Some very important people who like to profit from riding a bias say so, and you will be in big trouble if you do not believe them and do what they say. That sounds like slavery of a sort to me, but mind enslavement or conceptual enslavement.
Just remember that more than likely Jesus was put to death for using hemp extract to heal people. Perhaps a good question would be why people cannot just figure out for themselves that cannabinoids can cure them of their maladies, simply and straightforwardly? The answer to that is: People develop a kind of side by side comparative intelligence that is good for comparison or biasing, but this develops an incapacity to look at a larger picture or think beyond a specific status bias or confrontational nature. Of course the whole story of Jesus was altered to help big bias control other people of bias. Jesus has become a "banner boy" or "hoopla hero". If you consider this well; this is where a "biasing kind" would want him to be. That is to say it would give credibility to official lyings of biasing leaders.
In groups of people or in civilization, wisdom, understanding, and good will are not prized: Prizes are prized. Our general interfacing is given to high biasing reality. Does this affect our overall nerve function? Does too much noise make you deaf? Does too much light make you blind? Does too much bias allow you to be unbiased? We all know there is conceptual bias. We usually call it an "ism" of some sort racism, classism. We can't clarify "conceptual" bias too much, because our way of life or "high civilization" is totally dependent on playing or riding a belief based bias. There is no such thing as a truth based bias. Hence, the rarely spoken phrase; "beware the levening of the Pharisees".
One cannot cure a problem by blending bias fields, since bias is essentially untrue to begin with. One kind of lie cannot actually make another kind of lie into truth. The only thing that can be done to cure a bias problem is to "debias" or do some kind of bias damping procedure.
A common bias of leadership is installed with fear or an ever looming fear of being kicked out of the bias field of power. Some of the most famous leaders in history realized that when they reach the pinnacle of power, they no longer have any restrictions on their ability to use their power bias and kill dissenters. They will also try to jail or kill anyone who has a voice to dissent to "high biasing organization".
People mostly deal with what is there to make a living. In civilization "high biasing gamers or players" tend to succeed in the bias riding game of power. Gaming and consequently biasing has to do with narrowing one's activities and go forth with the intention of pretending one is abiding by the rules, or cheating with effectiveness. There is actually no "life imperitive" for an "overlarge topping game" of uber biasing.
Biasing people are gamers who will be adamantly against debiasing, because it desolves or dilutes their lie or play a bias. In short, they will kill you or "your kind" for money or to be center of attention.
When the chief debiaser of reality was confronted by the most powerful biasers of the time they nailed him to a post, but they had to connive or conspire to do it. The next part of that story is when asking the crowd to choose between a biasing force and a non biasing phenom. They chose the "blood and guts" player known as Barrabas. So the way this works is that bias tends to creat a field of bias issueing from biasing figures. In a field of high bias, non bias tends to look like non valuable.
So what would neural de-biasing look like? It might look like a crazy person in the act of not being crazy. It might look like an angry person being kind. It might look like Dick Cheney telling the truth about 911.
We live in a world arranged around the bias of popular beliefs or untruths that have been solidified and made official. We live in cowering obedience to formidable institutionalized power to kill or jail us. Players want to "process you" in a bad way and on a bias from which they can win or profit. Bias players are not going to want you to be well, if they cannot get wealth from you being sick.
It's actually somewhat difficult to tell who the "biasing super psychos" are because they tend to try to make their biasing nature seem legitimate or even good. These are leaders and "holy men".
The most likely "sign" of a bias believer is the official clothing they will wear. It means they have or believe they should have the power to do a beat down or killing and thereby maintain the bias of "God". If one considers it thoroughly (not on a bias) they will be able to see that the "God" that they talk about is actually just the head of the group in which they hold status and play their status games.
We can get a picture of biasing each time someone poses a threat of punisment for non obedience to their rules, that come straight from "God" or their god.
At any rate, we are surrounded by bias and are blinded and made stupid by conformity (either forced or voluntary) by bias. It's like and overriding imbalancing energy that can be taken to mortal extremes.
We have the exiled Rick Simpson, who has been healing people with cannabis extract. But although the healed migh be actually healed, this is not legal so they are not healed while retaining the official biases of da law. They have to give up the official bias of the law as enforced by highly biased and indifferent enforcers, to be healed by an illegal or taboo substance.
Obviously if it heals you but as a side effect could make you high, then it should be illegal.
The fact of the matter is, enforcible bias is not freedom no matter how much it is said to be "Freedom". We go to war for either or both official "Freedom" or "God" which is a way of euphemizing "what we want" and we'll kill for it.
Why do we invest so much in chain of command and killing people we don't know for reasons we cannot establish? If we want to ride the bias because it is less stressful and allows us to procreate, then we will go along with that. It might make us sick, stupid, psycho, or dead, but it's a "know path".
How does a bias mess you up? It is basically a force that demands attention or it will destabilize you position. It is like your personal bias is the only noise you want to listen to and the only noise you are listening for. It tends to poison the peace and adaptability of you (the life form) that is obliged to adapt to bias. Conceptually in civilization we get a dump truck of bias dumping where we live, and you have to climb a pile just to breath.
Any questions? Make a reply.

Hollow Moon Theory

I am not sure that i have ever seen anyone actually try to deal with this possibity before. I know that there is some school of thought that the Earth might be hollow. I expect it could be but i doubt anyone is going to go down there to find out, since it seems like it should be very hot or molten down there.
The Moon might be an entirely different kind of story. While planets and moons are held together by gravity, they are not held together by a gravity field coming from the center of the object. In fact it would seem that the force of gravity at the center of these bodies should add up to zero, or the sum total of all the gravity that the astral body generates is necessarily going to decrease as one moves toward the center. Depending on the mass density distribution, the force of gravity on the outer surface of the body should be similar if "the moon" or whatever body should be similar on the surface whether the body was uniformly solid or if it has a large hollow or gaseous center.
The Moon or Earth's moon seems to have been formed by a large collision at high enough velocity to actually have bashed the Earth with such energy and force to "knock off a chunk" driving it into orbit.
If one were to imaging that this were so, then at least part of the body might be molten or plastic in nature.
If the inner energies were similar to the inner energies of the earth, there would likely be a great deal of extremely high pressure and heat trapped within it as it was carreening off into a stabile orbit.
Now let's guess that the moon could have similar mass density to that of the Earth, or the origional body that smashed into the earth 4 to 4.5 billion years ago. If superficial Earth forces can create Himalayas and super volcanos, perhaps there could have been similar internal forces on the Moon.
Now given these realities and possibilities, the Moon could well have been expanded from the inside by outward pushing forces that would only be "countered" by gravity as it the mass displaces outward from the center. There could be something that might be likened to a balloon effect where the containing force of gravity only begins to increase as one moves away from the zero gravity center.
Now if this is possible, then there arises the possibilty that the moon continued to expand until a moon volcano could have released the internal pressure.
The entire Moon could be hollow in the center with very low gravity aligning toward the center space on the inner surface. Probably technologically adept creatures could live or have a contained living space within the hollow space in the moon. And this could easily be more than half the volume of the Moon.
You probably heard it here first. Aside from my own mind meanderings, i have actually never heard of this before. It seems both obvious and then not really clear.
My guess is that a good theoretical astro physicist might be able to analyze the moons oscillation and theorize futher on this matter. I understand that there is a sizable "hole" on the far side of the Moon.
It might be an interesting problem (however old), that some smart person could solve. As far as it being a place to live; there is probably enough energy from the sun to engineer a living space within the moon if the protected space or volume was already there.
A likely scenario might be that if it were pushed out and then solidified water would probably be one of the pressurizing gases, then if it were to push through the surface, it could do a kind of rapid cooling of the internal fires of the moon as it escaped into space.

Local Energy Capture and Use.

It seems as if we have been leaving most of our energy concerns to "central authorities" or those people who like to manage theses matters. For what it's worth, this might not be the best way to go, since even though it is serviceable now but may be succeptable to disasters of circumstances. Probably a decentralized system that could take over for or completely replace big and wasteful systems. There are a few things that can be done to make changes for both effiency of use, as well as cleaning up the fuel burn to carbon dioxide and water.

As far as giving energy use concepts away is concerned, i tend to think that if something is simple, and useful, it should not really be kept as "intellectual property".

Personally I suspect that someone could have thought of some of this already, but I have not seen any evidence so far. I realize people like to "ride a bias" and not become too inventive or try anything new. This could change, and probably should change.

The first one has to do with having an insulated tank heat reservoir using water. For materials there is a large amount of waste plastic that would likely serve for raw material. One could generate their own electricity at home using methane, and save all the heat for heating. This way there would be a usable heat source for heating (as heated water) and there could be at least two techniques to save energy for electric power when little electric power is being used. This way there would be something of a buffer for both heat and electric by keeping heat energy in hot water and potential energy for electric in either a battery or pneumatic storage tank.

Starting out with the heat reserve insulated water tanks. It seems like it could be fairly easy to have an insulated water tank or water tanks. In addition, having a supply of fresh water could be a very good thing. Normally rain runs away with gravity or whatever. People could likely catch a good deal of precipitation from their roofs. They could probably store it in either their "heat or cold" holding tank or capture and store it in a dedicated precipitation tank, that could be used for gardening or whatever as needed. It would be kind of like insurance against shortages of water or energy.

Simply put, you could have a methane powered generator for electric and capture all the heat for later use as home heating. If methane was used, the exhaust would be very clean, and the heat from the engine and exhaust could be captured nearly 100%. Of course there would be pure water coming off in the exhaust and that could be captured along with the exhaust heat by venting it into the insulated water reserve. So far we are getting electric power, heat, and clean water compared with the same methane we previously got somewhat inefficient heating with what we use now.

Electric will become something of a freebee, while our home heating makes a leap in overall efficiency.

It doesn't seem as if any of the parts for this simple system would be very expensive. Insulated plastic water tanks could, in fact, be a life changing convenience for places like Afghanistan or Haiti. The could have passive air conditioning and heating as well a way to hold and keep water. To me it seems like water capture and holding would be a huge benefit for just about everyone everwhere. Think of it this way: It's water, one of the first molecules in the universe, and while being the "platform" for all life, has some very usable physical attributes and properties, that can be put to use every day. Water is the best substance for holding and transfering heat, as well as innumerable other things. People could likely store enough ice in a cold or ice reservoir to keep their homes cool in the heat of summer.

With water/heat/cold reservoirs, there would be some kind of programmable device to capture the Sun's heat or the Winter's cold.

A heat capture panel could well be very simplistic with modern plumbing materials. With a heat capture panel you could heat water on a sunny day and use it on cloudy/cool day. The point with that would be you could cut down your heating bill by capturing and saving heat when you can.

There seems to be 2.5 ways of getting free electric. One would be solar cells with a method to save in a reservoir, of battery or pneumatic tank or tanks.

There's wind power that could also be saved in both battery and/or pneumatic tank.

I haven't seen anyone try to store energy in pneumatic tanks, but it seems very possible. It could be thought of as a huge spring as far as stored energy is concerned, and energy output can be tweeked by heat absorbtion. This would be one of the best ways to turn heat energy into mechanical or electric power. This is according to Boyle's Law where the total energy held in a gas is proportional to the absolute temperature of the gas. So probably the total energy in the working pneumatic tank could be expanded from about 25 to 50 percent depending on the internal temperature before and after the heat was applied. Obviously some kind of working pressure in the decompressing tank could take on heat and increase a substantial amount and in proportion to the total gas density within the working pneumatic tank. If it were very cold outside the could make a good deal more electric power from adding heat before reaching the pneumatic motor and generator.

I understand there are pnumatic powered cars in France. I have never acually seen a pnumatically powered vehicle, but it seems like a good idea for storing and using energy for motive power. I would be willing to bet one could create a heat capture drive train that would work better than hybrid with storage batteries, because heat could be added to the pneumatic drive train directly from the engine heat and exhaust. Of course one of the ways one could get the engine and exhaust heat would be using water or steam to add heat to the pneumatic tank. I haven't seen anyone try to build a fuel engine/heat capture pneumatic drive train combination. I expect someone hold a patent for it, but i have never seen one. I would imagine that a pneumatic drive train could make for a "very zippy yet efficient car". It could be called a hybrid, and could capture energy from braking. You wouldn't have to use injection to get heaping power at the wheels.

I don't know anyone who wants to discuss this stuff. I think it might need a grass roots effort of sorts. Big energy has an interest in big energy and centralization. There are some items in life that should not be exclusively controlled by "big central". You could save your own water from rain if necessary, you could save a great deal of heat, and refigeration.

There might be a good possibilty that we could get a substantial amount of electrical energy for personal use from the wind using pneumatic or battery storage. Probably a local windmill might be better than a huge windmill with a huge transmission grid.